When this problem was publicized last year, I looked at satellite maps of FP. There are already more than 1 corridor for power lines. 5 acres and 400 trees is a tiny fraction of land and vegetation to expend, if the stability of the grid depends on this new line. If it does, and you are again successful in jeopardizing the grid, and in the future, we have resulting blackouts, will your group own up to your causal responsibility?
Conversely, if the expanded power capability is for Bitcoin and/or AI, I am on your side!!
I am looking to educate myself on this issue and don't understand why the city can't get power out to Washington County without cutting down more trees?
Success is a journey, not a destination. It requires constant effort, vigilance and reevaluation." - Mark Twain
Thank you for reminding us of the challenge that lies ahead!
When this problem was publicized last year, I looked at satellite maps of FP. There are already more than 1 corridor for power lines. 5 acres and 400 trees is a tiny fraction of land and vegetation to expend, if the stability of the grid depends on this new line. If it does, and you are again successful in jeopardizing the grid, and in the future, we have resulting blackouts, will your group own up to your causal responsibility?
Conversely, if the expanded power capability is for Bitcoin and/or AI, I am on your side!!
I am looking to educate myself on this issue and don't understand why the city can't get power out to Washington County without cutting down more trees?
Thank you for your comments and questions. This is a great resource to learn more and get additional background about this issue: https://birdallianceoregon.org/press/file-a-motion-to-intervene-in-pges-appeal-to-luba/?gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22552921090&gbraid=0AAAAACtht9ESHrGAgbYf7yjotjF5iAvE3&gclid=CjwKCAiA3-3KBhBiEiwA2x7FdEo4rETM8bqZQikNB5IRIUh1c0wp_Wv05-IgRHeOWvIZz2XayPnuZBoCVbQQAvD_BwE