So this whole complaint is based on the perception that the video is too well done? I’d hope you would expect a bit more evidence than that before publishing this giant AI slop letter.
The issue is not quality of production but who paid for it. The higher the apparent quality of production, the higher must be the estimate of the cost to produce it. If he would provide documentation of the costs involved, we could speak more specifically.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU: TJ Anderson and Deian Salazar
Putting Mitch Green under review will hopefully alert lazy voters that misconduct is unacceptable behavior. His DSA credentials are offensive enough to call for his defeat but immorality is a slap in everyone's face.
This is just another example of "slick Mitch". After his boondoggle trip to Vienna (where his wife came along) he didn't file the required paperwork of receipts and trip justification. He never even did the required post-trip report. He's told citizens that he's for "holistic public safety" but he's actively defunded public-safety measures. He's told us he's concerned about livability issues, but he has actively opposed camp/tent removals. He touts his high academic degrees in economics, but he has seemed to have completely missed the point that taxpayers and businesses (evil corporations, according to him) fund the city and county services.
Thanks to TJ Anderson and Deian Salazar for making this happen. I had asked earlier on Brian Owendoff’s Substack for help in how to file an ethics complaint because it was obvious that Mitch’s slick video was a campaign ad done on the city’s dime. Given how the city worked together to sabotage the Safer Portland initiative, it will be interesting to see how they move to investigate Mitch or will the collude again to bury this formal complaint.
Do not rank the rank Mitch on any ballots this November. Ditch Mitch!
So this whole complaint is based on the perception that the video is too well done? I’d hope you would expect a bit more evidence than that before publishing this giant AI slop letter.
The issue is not quality of production but who paid for it. The higher the apparent quality of production, the higher must be the estimate of the cost to produce it. If he would provide documentation of the costs involved, we could speak more specifically.
Mitch Green? Is that you?
THANK YOU, THANK YOU: TJ Anderson and Deian Salazar
Putting Mitch Green under review will hopefully alert lazy voters that misconduct is unacceptable behavior. His DSA credentials are offensive enough to call for his defeat but immorality is a slap in everyone's face.
This is just another example of "slick Mitch". After his boondoggle trip to Vienna (where his wife came along) he didn't file the required paperwork of receipts and trip justification. He never even did the required post-trip report. He's told citizens that he's for "holistic public safety" but he's actively defunded public-safety measures. He's told us he's concerned about livability issues, but he has actively opposed camp/tent removals. He touts his high academic degrees in economics, but he has seemed to have completely missed the point that taxpayers and businesses (evil corporations, according to him) fund the city and county services.
Thanks to TJ Anderson and Deian Salazar for making this happen. I had asked earlier on Brian Owendoff’s Substack for help in how to file an ethics complaint because it was obvious that Mitch’s slick video was a campaign ad done on the city’s dime. Given how the city worked together to sabotage the Safer Portland initiative, it will be interesting to see how they move to investigate Mitch or will the collude again to bury this formal complaint.
Do not rank the rank Mitch on any ballots this November. Ditch Mitch!
Strike Four! Bad look for a wannabe Apparatchik. Even one with a striking resemblance to V.I. Lenin. When is the next train to Helsinki?