Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Paul Douglas's avatar

We've been members of Lan Su for a number of years, as well as occasional supplementary donors.

Not to be negative here, but Elizabeth Nye sent out a blanket endorsement by Lan Su for Ballot Measure 20-26, the recent Portland Parks levy foisted on us by our dysfunctional City Council. When I wrote her a letter (on Nov. 1st, before the election) asking for an explanation of why Lan Su was supporting such a huge property tax increase for it's members when the Parks Bureau had demonstrably failed at following the rules in spending money for the 2020 levy, I got no response. After a long period of silence, I attempted to find out how to contact the Board of Lan Su. Guess what? Apparently there is no way to communicate with anyone on the Board about issues concerning Lan Su: only through the Executive Director can concerns be made. It was suggested that my letter may have been misplaced and I should try to email Ms Nye at elizabeth@lansugarden.org. I attached a copy of my original letter to Ms Nye on January 5th. I'm glad I didn't hold my breath waiting for a response.

In contrast, I wrote a similar letter to the Bird Alliance of Oregon questioning their uncritical endorsement of 26-20. Within a short period of time I got a phone call from the President of the Board Rich Van Buskirk, who held a 20 minute conversation with me about the reasoning (and the internal wrestling of the board) behind their decision. While I disagreed with their ultimate conclusion, I felt valued and heard. Lan Su's Executive Director clearly lives in a silo and apparently feels linking her personal political whims with the Lan Su organization without a disclaimer is okay. It is not, and we will not be renewing our membership to Lan Su next autumn. Those monies will go to partially pay for the huge property tax increase that the Park's Levy will cost us in November.

Thank you Elizabeth Nye.

No posts

Ready for more?