Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Ollie Parks's avatar

The Oregonian's coverage of the Multnomah Athletic Club bombing [1] reveals an editorial failure that accidentally confirms the broader critique running through both Portland Dissent [2] and the Northwest Examiner [3].

The piece reads as though Bruce Whitman were a victim rather than a perpetrator. His mother's grief leads the story. His half-brother's "he was a good guy, I thought" closes it. The language throughout is consistently gentle — Whitman "was facing mental health challenges," he "developed a violent obsession," he "was let go" from his job. This is the structure of a sympathetic obituary, not an accountability story about a man who spent four years terrorizing specific people before driving a rental car loaded with pipe bombs and propane into a building at three in the morning.

The most glaring problem is an absence. Heather Howett — the MAC member who feared for her life when Whitman showed up at her door disguised as an Amazon delivery driver, screamed at her for five minutes, and returned to park outside her home for weeks — does not appear in the Oregonian's piece at all. A small community paper found her and published her account the same day. The Oregonian, with vastly greater resources, apparently never called her. The cop who told Howett "you're not hurt, you're fine, right?" and the Oregonian reporter who never sought her out are working from the same assumption about whose experience matters.

This goes beyond fairness to victims. As both Portland Dissent and the Northwest Examiner make clear, the Oregonian's framing mirrors the institutional posture that allowed Whitman to remain a free and escalating threat for years. Norm Frink, a former Chief Deputy District Attorney, contacted DA Mike Schmidt's office directly seeking more aggressive intervention. The result, in Frink's words, was "some things around the edges." The system, he says, "is run by mental health advocates who don't believe in incarcerating the mentally ill, even if there is significant evidence they are dangerous."

The two red flag orders — under which Whitman surrendered guns in 2022 and again in February — are presented by the Oregonian as evidence the system did its job. Frink's account suggests the opposite: that the red flag orders were the minimum the system was willing to do, and that more aggressive action was available and refused. The Oregonian had the facts to pursue that question and chose not to.

Portland Dissent asks the question the Oregonian should have led with: how many other Whitmans are out there, and what is Portland going to do about them besides issue condolences? That question cannot be answered by coverage that treats the bomber's mother as the primary moral authority on what happened. It requires journalism willing to hold accountable the institutions — the DA's office, the police, the mental health system, and the press itself — whose shared assumptions made this outcome more likely than it needed to be.

---

**Sources:**

1. Austin De Dios, "'I didn't see': Mother of MAC bombing suspect said his mental health seemed improved before attack," The Oregonian/OregonLive, May 3, 2026.

2. Pamela Fitzsimmons, "The Age of Disgruntlement," Portland Dissent, May 4, 2026.

3. Allan Classen, "MAC suicide bomber harassed her in 2022," Northwest Examiner, May 4, 2026.

JW's avatar

It’s appalling that the police didnt look into this, how was that not illegal? Doesn’t surprise me at all in Portland, however.

No posts

Ready for more?